98-Year-Old Judge Seeks Supreme Court to Reopen Fitness Suspension Case

Table of Contents

A 98-Year-Old Judge Challenges the Supreme Court Over Her Suspension

A 98-year-old federal judge, Pauline Newman, is preparing to take her case to the Supreme Court after a recent decision by the D.C. Circuit denied an en banc rehearing of her lawsuit. Newman, who is the longest-serving active judge on the federal bench, has been involved in a legal battle with her colleagues over her suspension from the bench.

Newman, appointed by former President Ronald Reagan, serves on the Federal Circuit, which handles appeals in areas such as patents, international trade disputes, and benefits for veterans and government employees. The controversy surrounding her began in 2023 when she filed a lawsuit against her colleagues after they stopped assigning her cases and reassigned her law clerk. The judges claimed that her behavior had become erratic and "paranoid," suggesting signs of cognitive decline.

The judicial investigation into Newman’s fitness alleged that she had experienced "significant mental deterioration" following a heart attack. The report noted that she writes fewer opinions than her colleagues, takes longer to complete the ones she does, did not finish online security training, struggled to find files on her computer, and at one point threatened to have her staffer arrested.

Her suspension was initially set to last one year but has been extended twice. The Federal Circuit stated that Newman has not complied with the investigation into her fitness and has refused to undergo neurological tests.

Newman has strongly denied these allegations and has rejected suggestions to retire. She emphasized the importance of her role, stating, “It’s important to the nation, if I can say so. If I really were debilitated, as they say, physically and mentally, I hope I’d have the sense to step down. But as it is, I feel that I can make a contribution and must. That’s what I was appointed to do.”

Newman has received support from some of her colleagues and organizations such as the right-wing New Civil Liberties Alliance. This support has bolstered her determination to continue fighting for her position on the bench.

Key Points of the Controversy

• The dispute began in 2023 when Newman's colleagues suspended her from the bench.
• The suspension was based on allegations of cognitive decline and erratic behavior.
• A judicial investigation found evidence of significant mental deterioration.
• Newman has denied all allegations and refuses to retire.
• Her suspension has been extended twice due to non-compliance with the investigation.
• Newman believes she can still contribute meaningfully to the judiciary.
• Support from some colleagues and groups like the New Civil Liberties Alliance has helped her case.

Legal Proceedings and Next Steps

Newman's attorney has confirmed that she plans to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. This move could have significant implications for the future of her career and the broader debate about judicial fitness and retirement.

The case raises important questions about the balance between judicial independence and the need to ensure that judges are capable of performing their duties effectively. It also highlights the challenges faced by older judges who may be reluctant to step down despite concerns about their health or ability.

As the legal battle continues, the public and legal community will be watching closely to see how the Supreme Court responds to Newman's appeal. The outcome could set a precedent for similar cases in the future.

Conclusion

Judge Pauline Newman's case has sparked a national conversation about the responsibilities of judges, the importance of judicial fitness, and the rights of older judges to continue serving. As she prepares to take her case to the Supreme Court, the stakes are high for both Newman and the broader judicial system. The resolution of this case could have lasting effects on how courts handle similar situations in the future.